Not in my backyard! Give me a break!
In the Wednesday edition of the Grand Haven Tribune, a Letter to the Editor is expressing dismay concerning noise and light flicker issues. The couple that signed the letter mention that these machines make noise and we should be very concerned about that.
The couple that has expressed this concern live in a $2,000,000 lake front home just north of Lake Michigan Drive on the west side of Lake Shore Drive, south of Grand Haven, Michigan. Their home will be approximately 4000 feet away from the installation site for these two wind turbines. They will have no view of the turbines from their home as there is a small rise with large oak trees between them and the water treatment plant. The turbine site is at a lower elevation south of the water treatment plant.
One study published by the Renewable Energy Research Laboratory at the University of Massachusetts (www.ceere.org/rerl) recommends a wind turbine noise study be completed and published if there will be residences within a distance of three times the blade tip height of the site of the turbine. For this particular installation that would be a distance of 900 feet. My guess as to the likely site described in the press release would put the closest home at further than 2300 feet from the turbines. Almost three times the distance above what would be recommended for a study.
Some other considerations for this resistance is the ambient noise that will exist at this site. The roadway that runs north and south on the west side of the water treatment plant has a 55 mile per hour speed limit. At times such as normal going to and coming home from work there is considerable traffic on this road. Truck traffic is restricted to minimal use on this road by the Grand Haven Township.
The most significant source of ambient noise at this site, that would cancel any and all noise generated by these wind turbines, is the sound of Lake Michigan's waves coming ashore on the beach. This wave noise results in a roar that can be heard for quite some distance from the beach. The location of this particular couples home is within 100 feet of the beach. Noise generated by waves and the wind blowing unabated from the Lake results in a roar that would drown out any downwind sources of the magnitude generated by these wind turbines.
Another issue they complain about is "light flicker". This is a result of the light from the sun shining at a low angle, such as sunrise and sunset, through the blades causing a flickering shadow striking a residence. This can be very annoying for the home owner. There are three homes to the east of the proposed site that may have a "light flicker" problem. I don't have the capability to determine if this will be a problem at this site. The homes are approximately 2300 feet away, at minimum, and the wind turbines will be approximately 300 feet tall. From very rough calculations, the sun would be lower then 7 degrees above the horizon to cause a shadow to fall across these homes. With the local vegetation and the lake front dune, which at this area is not very high, this may or may not be an issue.
What really amazes me is the resistance to wind turbines with little or no experience or thought as to other noise or environmental issues.
Vehicle travel on Lake Shore Drive is especially heavy during the summer months. This is especially of greater concern during these months as windows are more likely to be open. The current popularity with Harley Davidson motorcycles is one of particular concern. The term "Rolling Thunder" is one that is applied with particular pride by the motor cycling crowd with regard to these machines. The louder the better. They even use the argument that it is safer if they are loud because more people are aware of them. Where is the resistance to this noise? Are current noise regulations enforced concerning these vehicles? Obviously not!

The current season brings to the fore front another annoying noise. Leaf blowers! The prevalence of these extremely loud devices and their constant use by landscape maintenance crews and home owners is much more of an issue then the wind turbines.

This area has an excellent example of what the wind turbine installation is trying to mitigate. We have the Consumers Power Campbell Coal Fired Electric Generating facility just south of the GR Water Treatment Plant. This plant is a 1440 MW base load generating plant. The base load designation means that it is running the majority of the time. This facility has provided the area with many millions of dollars of taxes to provide services for the people living in this area.
The generating facility is almost hidden behind the mountain of coal that is burned at this site.Unfortunately, this generation process burns coal. Lots of it! Over 5 million tons of coal every year. This results in long trains running through the city of Holland that most people that live in this area have experienced. Consumers Power has spent millions of dollars to reduce the amount of effluent going out the smoke stacks. This does not reduce the carbon dioxide resulting from the process. Additionally, the stacks are built very high to distribute the particulate matter and other effluents over a greater area. Is this what we want, more of this?

The resistance expressed in the Letter to the Editor appears to be a reiteration of ignorant self serving resistance to any change. The demand for electricity is growing daily. Do we want to do everything possible to implement alternative generation systems or do we want to build more coal burning plants?
The policies that have been adopted by the city of Grand Rapids to investigate and implement any alternative that proves feasible to get to 100% renewable energy sources should be celebrated and supported, not vilified for effects that are not relevant.
Thank you Grand Rapids for your efforts! An information and comment meeting will be held at the Grand Haven Township Hall on November 30, 2009 at 6pm to 8pm.















































